Judge Must Explain Millennium Bomber's Sentence; Both Prosecution and Defense Appealed Ruling
The Columbian › November 17, 2006
Linked as:
The Columbian › November 17, 2006
Linked as:Summary
SEATTLE -- Federal appeals court judges considering the case of Ahmed Ressam said Monday that the judge who sentenced him to 22 years for planning to bomb Los Angeles International Airport "didn't explain himself," and they indicated that they might send the case back to have him spell out his rationale.
"He just picked a number out of a hat," Judge Pamela Ann Rymer said. "We can't tell from anything he said why he picked that number as opposed to any other."See the full content of this document
Extract
Judge Must Explain Millennium Bomber's Sentence; Both Prosecution and Defense Appealed Ruling
The three-judge panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from U.S. Attorney John McKay and from Ressam's lawyer, Tom Hillier, challenging aspects ...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Calendarcalendar | edmc submits letters to u.s. senate health, education, labor, and pensions ('help') committee | Cape Elizabeth's Condo Project Getting Under Way in a Big Way | Malloy Spells Out Policy On Health Care? Needs | Sentencia de Cour de cassation, September 26, 1989 (caso Cour de Cassation, Chambre sociale, du 26 sep... | Sentencia de Cour de cassation, June 08, 1994 (caso Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile 1, du 8 juin 1994, 92-16.142) | Sentencia de Cour de cassation, October 10, 1995 (caso Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile 1, du 10 octobre 1995, 93-20.771) | Sentencia de Cour de cassation, June 20, 2000 (caso Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, du 20 juin 2000, 99-85.780, Publi)