The Columbian

Copyright columbian.com. All rights reserved.

Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.

from January 01, 2004
Last Document: May 03, 2012

ISSN 1043-4151

[Content not included in vLex Global Academic]





FeediconRSS    What's this?

Browse by Day

Sections



Calendar

2007November

December October

Other related sources

The Columbian, November 26, 2007

Opinion

Rewind: Editorials From Our Archives

Civil rights activists reached deep into their pockets late last week to prevent the U.S. Supreme Court from talking about affirmative action. They were worried that the high court would take the wrong side. The Supreme Court has shown little sympathy for affirmative action lately. The most recent example is Proposition 209, California's voter-approved ban on race and gender preferences in hiring and school admissions. The nine justices let the ban stand. Defenders of affirmative action knew ...

In Our View: Let's Go to the Video

Surveillance video of students and happenings in public schools or on public transportation absolutely qualify as information that should be made available to the public. How ridiculous for the Kelso School District to contend that video taken on one of its school buses was private student information. Thank goodness, the state Supreme Court remembers who the buses and schools belong to: taxpayers.

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company